Health Providers in Bangladesh
Corruption, provider practice, motivation and health system performance in Bangladesh
Health systems in many countries create incentives for health workers to engage in corrupt practices that lead to inappropriate and ineffective care, leading to high costs and poor outcomes for those in need of care.
The corruption issue:
We know that the health care that people receive in many countries is far from ideal. There are many reasons for this but one is that even the most committed health workers often face insuperable barriers to providing the care that their patients need while, at the same time, the incentives created by the health system encourage them to adopt responses that benefit themselves but harm the patient. Many of these involve the use of public resources for private gain. Some of the most obvious examples include diverting patients to private facilities owned by the health worker, charging informal fees, and theft of medicines and equipment. Others are less obvious, such as recommending unnecessary treatment for which the health worker is remunerated. In others, the health worker is gaining by depriving the system of their time, for example by being absent from work even though they are being paid to be there. Consequently, these practices fall within our definition of corruption in the health sector.
Theory of Change:
IF: we can identify and implement policies and practices that remove the incentives for ineffective and inappropriate health care (specifically absences from work, diverting patients to private facilities, informal charging, under- and over-treatment), which can be financial (e.g. higher and better targeted pay, performance-related bonuses, other benefits) and non-financial (e.g. improved training and working conditions)
THEN: patients will receive better and more appropriate care
BECAUSE: the research will uncover policy combinations that work effectively in the specific political context by disincentivising poor practice.
Scoping literature review, policy analysis, qualitative study, survey of up to 400 providers including discrete choice experiment (DCE) and open-ended vignettes methods to understand the choices made by health providers, given a series of hypothetical anti-corruption strategies.
Main Partners: The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM) and James P Grant School of Public Health (JPGSPH) of BRAC University.
Productive investments in the power generation sector have been minimal, while less efficient and more costly investments have multiplied. There has been significant corruption through rent capture be...
As a developing country subject to potentially serious damage as a result of climate change, Bangladesh has received significant subsidies from development partners to invest in adaptation and mitigat...
There are many reasons why healthcare providers should be accountable to the communities they serve. This includes enhancing the trust that underpins the patient-health worker relationship and its the...
Overall, the performance of skills training programmes in Bangladesh has been poor. But some targeted programmes have done well because they have addressed relevant market failures with targeted fundi...
This cross-country project will trace the evolution of such local firms and analyse their impact on growth in their respective sectors. It will attempt to isolate proactive policy from their experienc...
Health systems in many countries create incentives for health workers to engage in corrupt practices that lead to inappropriate and ineffective care, leading to high costs and poor outcomes for those ...